Dissent: Appeals Court Should Have Ruled Entrapment on A.T.F. “Fictional House” Hit
A “shot in the dark” sting tactic ruled legal by a federal appellate court should have been declared unlawfully heavy-handed, a dissenting judge who presided over the case concluded. Judge John Noonan said Monday that his colleagues on the ninth circuit court of appeals in San Francisco should have used their authority to consider arguments not made by the defendant to conclude he was a victim of entrapment. The court ruled 2-1 that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives was justified when it…